Defending the Defenseless, A Guide to Protecting and Advocating for Pets is almost several books in one, one telling the story of author Allie Phillips’ knowledge of animal laws and regulations, another outlining effective advocacy, marketing and public relations strategies that shelters and animal rescue organizations should use; another advising shelters and animal rescue organizations how to avoid compassion fatigue, success stories of various organizations, and the culmination in each chapter “You Can Do More”, whether it’s parents, kids, shelter workers, teachers, shelter and rescue workers or the general public.
The 278-page-book, published in 2011 by Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. is not a quick read. It is loaded, and loaded with tons of information that would be useful to anyone in the shelter world. There’s also segments sprinkled in throughout the book where youths or adults aspiring to work in animal related professions can look beyond the world of veterinary science to animal care education, animal therapy, and more.
In Chapter 1, she starts off citing statistics on how Americans feel about animal welfare, she cites that 28 percent strongly support and 41 percent somewhat support the goal of minimizing and eventually eliminating all forms of animal cruelty and suffering. She goes into great detail to explain the difference between animal rights and animal welfare. The first eliminates any idea that there’s some appropriateness for certain actions. Whereas animal welfare advocates understand that animals should be protected from harm but not equal to humans. The Animal Defense Fund has created an Animal bill of Rights that it has submitted to Congress which includes the right of animals to live free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect and abuse.
Establishing goals and understanding that those in shelters and rescue organizations cannot help every animal. They can only help one animal at a time is key to avoiding compassion fatigue.
This book is so full of information that it’s difficult to cite specifics. Allie Phillips is an attorney by profession, and her path that led her from criminal prosecution to defending the animals.
In Chapter 6, she deals with Models for Thriving Animal Organizations: Saving More Lives through Innovation. She quotes Tracy Coppola, former policy and government affairs associate for the American Humane Society, who spent two years, 2008-2009 researching a paper Examining America’s Pet Overpopulation Crisis, Controversy and Solutions. She says a no-kill shelter ideally is a shelter that is able to save all the healthy, adoptable and/or treatable animals from euthanasia.
Phillips continue on saying that shelters in the United States take in 8 to 9 million animals every year with about four million being euthanized. That’s about half. With the financial crisis of 2008 – 2010 those number have most likely increased because so many surrendered their animals to shelters because of economics.
The No Kill Advocacy Center was started to help shelters re-think housing and re-homing animals. The Center has created a model for change the No Kill Equation, education no-kill legislation through conferences and books including Redemption, Irreconcilable Differences: The Battle for the Heart & Soul of America’s Animal Shelters.
While Americans are becoming less tolerant of senseless euthanasia and an epidemic of pet overpopulation, they are at the root of the problem because they don’t spay/neuter their pets, and treat them like disposable objects. The shelters aren’t creating the problem. People are. Yet shelters are left to deal with the problem. The unpredictability of the numbers of animals going to shelters every day is a daunting problem.
San Diego Humane Society President Dr. Mark Goldstein has an innovative theory on the dilemma. Much of it is messaging, the core of a good public relations campaign. They have not euthanized a healthy, treatable animal since 2001, and they’ve helped more than 38,000 animals a year. He believes in first improving the lives of animals in the community, rather than focusing on adoptions and euthanasia.
- Adopting out of love rather than desperation.
- People taking better care of their pets
- People keeping their pets
- To help people cope with and address social and behavior issues, reasons for surrendering their animals to shelters.
- Making spaying/neutering commonplace, regardless of where someone resides.
- Working towards a day when the only animals coming to shelters are seriously ill or dangerous.
The San Diego Humane Society and SPCA talk about changing how our messages are packaged. They recommend:
- Low cost spay/neuter programs should be affordable or subsidized, Low cost has no value and sends the wrong message.
- Animal control should be called animal services, to stop focusing on control aspect if animal welfare and focus on the services that people can provide to help animals.
- The term euthanasia should replace kill because no shelter wants to kill animals, but for some reason or another, they must end that animals’ life
- Shifting terminology from rescue to adopt, not saying rescued a cat from a shelter, but adopting a cat from a shelter. When animals need to be rescued it conjures up thoughts that it’s a bad place.
What they’ve done differently?
They’ve created a welcoming environment and showcasing animals. They have become the San Diego Campus for Animal